Solution No. 3
Augmented
Category 6 (Cat 6A) is the new cabling kid on the block! Many once
thought copper cabling would never support speeds above 1 Gig, but Cat
6A has proven that wrong and allowed copper cabling to live on. There
is even talk that copper cabling may still be around when we reach 40
Gig!
As the industry strives to make sense of the new Cat 6A standards
and solutions, there has been much debate about Cat 6A unshielded
twisted pair (UTP) vs. Cat 6A shielded twisted pair (STP) and which is
the better option for supporting 10 Gig. Both solutions have their
place, and this article aims to provide some key information that will
help our customers make an informed decision.
Standards and Alien Crosstalk
In June of 2006, the IEEE released the 802.3an 10GBASE-T standard,
which specifies 10Gbs data transmission over four-pair copper cabling.
Following that standard, the Telecommunications Industry Association
(TIA) began work on transmission performance specifications for the
cabling. In February 2008, they published TIA Standard 568-B.2-10:
Transmission Performance Specifications for 4-Pair 100 Ohm Augmented
Category 6 Cabling. The new Cat 6A standard extends the frequency of
Cat 6A cables to 500 MHz and includes specifications for a new
performance parameter known as Alien Crosstalk (ANEXT). Category 6A
cables are fully backward compatible with all the previous categories,
including Category 6 and 5e.
ANEXT is crosstalk that occurs between adjacent cables and
connecting hardware. While not a problem at the lower frequencies of
Cat 5e and Cat 6 cabling, the higher frequency signals of Cat 6A makes
ANEXT the limiting noise source for these systems. Active equipment can
effectively reduce near-end and far-end crosstalk between pairs in a
cable using cancellation technology that relies on crosstalk coming
from a known source. However, with ANEXT, the source is unknown and
cannot be cancelled out by the equipment.
In order to mitigate ANEXT in a UTP copper cabling system, cabling
vendors have had to develop unique cable and connectivity designs under
stringent specifications. Because ANEXT is increased when adjacent
cables are close proximity, it is typically recommended to let cables
lay loosely in pathways versus tight, twisted bundles when deploying
UTP Cat 6A systems. Another option is the use of STP cabling components
where the shield that surrounds the pairs isolates adjacent cables from
each other to eliminate ANEXT. Fortunately, Reality Bytes offers both
UTP and STP Cat 6A options. Following is some key information needed to
make the best choice for each installation.
CAT 6A UTP vs. STP
Due to its ease of installation and familiarity among installers, Cat
6A UTP is today’s cabling of choice for the ability to support future
bandwidth needs and 10Gb/s performance. Our leading Category 6A UTP
plenum and riser-rated cable, patch panels, and jacks have been
extensively tested in the laboratory and field environments. They have
been proven to deliver excellent headroom and exceed the latest
TIA/EIA-568.B Category 6A specification to support 10GBASE-T, including
ANEXT performance requirements.
Our leading Cat 6A 24-port patch panels feature an innovative cable
feed bracket on the back of the patch panel to keep incoming cables
straight and separated from each other to help eliminate ANEXT at the
termination point. Our Leading Cat 6A keystone jacks feature easy
install 110 terminations and feature a patented PCB circuit and contact
alignment that suppresses internal coupling between pairs.
While Cat 6A UTP cabling and connectivity components support 10
Gigabit, STP cabling systems are a viable alternative for running 10
Gig over copper. As shown in the graphic below, the shield in our STP
plenum and riser-rated cable does an excellent job of eliminating
ANEXT, providing an improvement in ANEXT performance over Cat 6A UTP.
In addition, the shield surrounding the pairs in the STP cable helps
prevents electromagnetic and radiofrequency interference (EMI/RFI) from
coupling onto twisted pairs. This can help to eliminate the effects of
noise from sources like machinery, generators, or medical imaging
equipment, making STP systems an ideal choice for industrial
environments and healthcare facilities.
Due to the fact that most residential systems are not faced with
EMI/RFI challenges, and the extra ANEXT performance is not typically
required for homeowners, UTP is still the recommended cabling type for
home installations. Furthermore, speeds of 10 Gbps are rarely available
to homeowners, and Cat 6A UTP is more than sufficient to meet all
current and future applications in the home. In fact, Cat 6 is still
adequate for most home installations, especially since the links tend
to be shorter.
While Cat 6 UTP may support 10 Gig in shorter links of less than 55
meters, Cat 6 ANEXT performance will likely not enable it support 10
Gig to the full 100-meter channel. It is therefore not recommended for
new commercial installations that are designed to support 10 Gig either
now or in the future. The following chart demonstrates the ANEXT
performance for Cat 6 UTP, Cat 6A UTP, and Cat 6A STP.
Myths Surrounding STP
There are many misconceptions in the industry surrounding STP cabling,
including installation, bonding and grounding, and overall cost.
The belief that shielded cabling systems take longer to install has
been around for many years and is based on older-style shielded systems
that required extra steps during installation. Many of today’s shielded
components include die-cast metal jacks that no longer require special
bonding of the shield, making the installation time comparable for both
UTP and STP. STP systems really only require a little extra time to
separate the overall shield from the cable. In addition, STP systems do
not typically need to be tested for ANEXT, which can be a fairly
time-consuming process with UTP.
The belief that bonding and grounding is more complex and time
consuming with STP systems is also a myth that has permeated the
industry. However, STP systems really require just the one additional
step of bonding the shielded patch panel to the rack using a 6 AWG
bonding conductor in exactly the same way that other equipment is
bonded. The shield of the STP cable is bonded to the patch panel during
termination, and the 6 AWG bonding conductor simply maintains the
continuity of that shield to ground because the rack is bonded to the
telecommunications room’s grounding busbar. Many also believe that
bonding shielded systems only at the telecommunications room and not at
the workstation end of a link will create an antenna effect. However,
only one ground connection is required for proper performance, and most
STP systems have ground connections at the computer, at the patch
panel, and another at the networking equipment. Even if a
battery-powered laptop is used at the workstation, there is still a
connection to ground in the closet and no problems with performance.
While shielded components do cost slightly more than UTP, the
increased performance and reduced testing time can ultimately lower the
total cost of ownership. It has been determined that next generation
cabling systems that aim to perform beyond 10 Gbs transmission speeds
will require shielded cabling and components, which makes STP systems
more future proofed than UTP. The result is similar lifetime costs for
both STP and UTP systems.
Cost-effective Setup Option
With the demand for more bandwidth continuing to rise, customers are
faced with making an informed choice between an STP and UTP system.
There is no one right answer, but by examining all the options and
determining a project’s specific performance needs, our customers can
put together the system that works best for them.
Because Reality Bytes offers a comprehensive offering of both Cat 6A
UTP and Cat 6A STP, including cable, jacks, patch panels, and patch
cords, our customers can choose to deploy a complete Cat 6A UTP
end-to-end system, a complete Cat 6A STP end-to-end system, or utilize
a mix of UTP and STP cabling components to maximize performance and cut
costs.
ANEXT is more of a concern where cables are bundled together for the
entire link length, such as in the data center or at the cross-connect
in the telecommunications room. To further mitigate ANEXT in these
environments, our Category 6A STP shielded patch cords can be used in
conjunction with Cat 6A UTP for horizontal links.
Category 6A UTP is ideal for horizontal links to the workstations,
because cables are typically unbundled and do not remain adjacent to
each other for the entire run. Using shielded patch cords is not at all
detrimental to system performance when combined with a UTP horizontal
cabling system. In fact, combining the two solutions provides both the
optimum performance of shielded where ANEXT is a concern and the
cost-effective, easy installation associated with UTP.